Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Banditqueen's avatar

Lovely post on Elizabeth and Henry's wedding. If Elizabeth had been a Spanish or French Princess having to prepare and travel to England and negotiations taking place, the delay would have been longer than a few months. Nobody would be questioning any delay. The preparations alone must have taken some time to arrange.

Thank you for explaining what actually happened from the contemporary sources and the context of Henry and Elizabeth's union.

Legal complications, the coronation of Henry and Henry's settlement of a divided group of factions all had to be done first. All delays are perfectly obvious to me and practical. I think the criticism of Henry in this shows people don't read anything.

Worse still is the accusation put forward by PG in her popular novels that Henry raped Elizabeth or tried her out. There is absolutely no evidence for this and it makes no sense at all. Unfortunately too many people believe such nonsense. We don't even know if Elizabeth was pregnant before her wedding or if Arthur was simply a few weeks premature. If she was then we should allow that the couple fancied each other and good luck to them. Again there is no evidence other than the dates not quite working out for anyone to know either way. Arthur was healthy and 8 month babies are not uncommon.

Was it a love match? Probably not but it grew into a successful one, they were devoted as a couple, had 7 children and despite the politics, Elizabeth found life with Henry rewarding.

Expand full comment
Patty Dennehy's avatar

Excellent post - one question: Is there any possible truth to the rumor that Elizabeth of York was already pregnant at the time they got married? Could they have slept together in December, which might explain Arthur's early arrival? Just curious, although I'm guessing it's doubtful. Thank you for your wonderful insights and the sharing of your knowledge.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts